|
Chronomodra
|
|
|
|
As posted over on Lit Soup, the L. Perkins Literary Agency is giving out personal rejection letters to queries received over the course of the next two weeks (until the 23rd). Naturally, if your query is good enough, they'll ask for a partial, but if you've ever griped about 'those lazy, insensitive agents sending nothing but form rejections', here's your chance to get an honest opinion on your work.
----------------------------- -Chro Author of Blades of the Fallen and The Spirit ShifterAnd blogger of Journey of the Scribe
|
|
richie_d
|
|
|
|
Thanks Chrono. Seems like a cool idea.
Just checked out their guidelines and it says they're looking for "science fiction and fantasy, horror, young adult fiction, and romance" so I guess my crime novel won't be appropriate for them.
|
|
Tommi
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but check out the post below where she gives a list of the books she'd like to see - this gives a slightly better idea of the kind of YA fiction she's looking at.
|
|
missmorston
|
|
|
|
I just submitted a query to her - thanks for the link Chro  I'll let y'all know what kind of personalised rejection I get. I can see it now ... 'Dear Ms Reed, NO! Well - that's personalised!!
Stop the sketch - it's too silly
|
|
eilidh
|
|
|
|
Dear Eilidh HELL NO. Beat that. 
Keep writing.
|
|
missmorston
|
|
|
|
You're on! How much you want to bet?  JR
Stop the sketch - it's too silly
|
|
eilidh
|
|
|
|
hmmm not sure who's going to win.  a free will?
Keep writing.
|
|
missmorston
|
|
|
|
Quote: eilidh, Saturday, 12 Jul 2008 18:28hmmm not sure who's going to win.  a free will? Sure - you're on  Only is it the winner or loser who gets one  By the time we hear back I'll have my edit uploaded ready  JR
Stop the sketch - it's too silly
|
|
benkelly
|
|
|
|
Is this not the most negative sort of attitude, personalised rejections? Would you really want an agent that came at life from this angle? Is she so not busy selling her client's work that she afford to patronise writers in her free time?
This post was last edited by benkelly, 12 Jul 2008, 20:35
"Suck it up, say thank you and move on."
|
|
eilidh
|
|
|
|
reminds me of Mat(t)... agents are not as busy as they want us believe.  A publisher (small) talked about how to find talent at a conference. It requires combing through thousands of submission to find the one diamond; however, small and new companies/agencies struggle to get this attention.
Keep writing.
|
|
missmorston
|
|
|
|
Quote: benkelly, Saturday, 12 Jul 2008 20:33Is this not the most negative sort of attitude, personalised rejections? Would you really want an agent that came at life from this angle? Is she so not busy selling her client's work that she afford to patronise writers in her free time? I think she's using a trainee, Mo, from what she says on her blog. The idea is that she (the agent) filters the queries - things she is interested in will get a request for a partial, and those she passes on go to the trainee, to give her practice in learning which to pass up and which to bin (I suspect), plus a bit of a stab at critting maybe. I'm not reading anything into it - it's a US agent anyway (may not be up for stuff from the UK), but it's a bit of fun ain't it? And a novel approach to the slush pile  Another thing stated on the blog is that she doesn't have a website, and has a yahoo email address. So I'm not counting the millions yet - just practicing honing my query letter skills  Maybe Chro can fill in a bit more detail for us? JR
Stop the sketch - it's too silly
|
|
missmorston
|
|
|
|
A PS - a quick look at P&E gives the Lori Perkins agency as legit and highly recommended, so maybe worth a passing query?
Stop the sketch - it's too silly
|
|
planetszpuk
|
|
|
|
It's just so desperate,
--------------------------- I'm in the doghouse (again). See my blog burn.
|
|
Chronomodra
|
|
|
|
Hmm. There seems to be some misunderstanding here, so I'll clarify. The vast majority of agents (or at least the vast majority of American ones, I don't know how it is across the pond) only send out form rejections, for a number of reasons. First, the number of people sending in queries necessitates it -- if they didn't send out form rejections, they'd never have time for anything else. Secondly, when they do make comments on an author's work, inevitably they get one of those idiots who sends them hate mail back and promises to strap dynamite to their dog, and that just doesn't encourage them to give out comments anymore. And lastly, for the people that are REALLY bad, it's hard to put down, "Please, do yourself a favor and stop writing.", so the form rejection is most polite. The deal is this: one of this agency's interns (who sorts through their queries anyway before they get to the higher-ups) is going to go through the slush pile as normal, but for the next two weeks, if she does reject something, she will reply back with a personalized note saying why. This is quite valuable to those of us getting nothing but form rejections, because it gives us a clue as to what is holding us back. While critique sites like YWO are helpful for developing your writing, most of us here can't say for certain why someone's novel keeps getting rejected, at least not from an agent's perspective. It's just another form of feedback, much like the professional critiques received by the top tenners here. If you find that sort of feedback patronizing, then by all means, don't bother taking advantage of it. But regardless of how you perceive it, they are going above and beyond what they need to do, and I think they should be commended for that.
----------------------------- -Chro Author of Blades of the Fallen and The Spirit ShifterAnd blogger of Journey of the Scribe
|
|
benkelly
|
|
|
|
You are right and there is huge potential benefit in it. But I think it probably could have been sold better (considering agents are in the business of selling). The professionals writing crits for YWO arrive at work from the point of it being the best on site for a given month. They come into it with a positive angle. The L Perkins 'blog' article didn't make any suggestion of anything other than rejection. Though I'm sure it's not what was intended. 'We'll be making an extra effort to provide feedback on every manuscript we see in the next two weeks, even those we ultimately feel unable to take on...' would have done fine. No mention of rejection. No making the poor old writer feel like they're labrats for an intern. I'm just being a picky old cow though
This post was last edited by benkelly, 13 Jul 2008, 07:46
"Suck it up, say thank you and move on."
|